The not interested streak has ended (thank the almighty powers of the sex drive). The incredibly long absence of sex from life ended in an all out super spectacular-rock your world-knock your socks off- can't believe it can be that good- fireworks in the background-grunting halleluia lovefest. (Yeah, it really was that good.) In related news; "The One" has been in a much better mood lately. I tend to forget how cranky he gets when the sex isn't flowing. He's very nice about it, telling me he can wait (or take care of it himself), But then he blows up just a little faster, is just a tad snippier, and . . . . hmm maybe it's just my perspective, because I don't have my rose colored glasses of lust on, or perhaps I'm just more judgmental and less relaxed without the sweet lasting lovejuice to oil my system. Never really considered that before, just always assumed it was him.
A long while back, back when the sky was still blue and the grass was still green and the brown barbaloots. . . . Oh, wait. Wrong story. What I meant was I took this class in high school. I have no idea what the title of it was but somehow we were on the topic of relationships and abstinence (this was the actual class discussion, not just my friends and I on the side of the main topic, which we probably weren't listening to) Anyways, I have only a vague idea what the context was, I only remember the quote and thinking how very profound the comment was. The girl who spoke was not at all to be placed in the Pius group of my classmates. She was overweight, with obvious self esteem problems that she compensated for with drug use and sexual activity. She was very outspoken and in this particular case it may have changed someone's view of men and relationships with them. The instructor was asking the female half of the group why they want a relationship, what drives their desire. One girl piped up with "to have someone to talk about my problems with". This was obviously not an answer that was acceptable to my "not so Pius" classmate who all Jerry Springerish quoted, "Don't get a man for someone to talk about your problems with. Half the time he IS the problem!" I'm not really sure why, but that stuck with me.
And the reason I brought that story up would be "The Other", don't get me wrong he isn't the problem. Well. . . not entirely the problem. What I mean to say is that now that we have a sexual relationship, I find it more difficult to be as open with him, which would seem a rather odd turn of events, but I've been assured that is very common, and I remember the same sort of thing happening with "The One" It's just I didn't see it coming this time. It's been six years since I've started a sexual relationship, and I guess I forgot about some of the logistics of how they work and as I've only had one, I didn't place stock in the progression of the first as a template to how this one might go. (and it's a really good thing I didn't) although this particular tidbit might have been handy to have forewarning on. It's not that I don't feel I can talk with "The Other". It's just I feel there are certain things I feel or think now that would affect things if I were to be totally open and honest as in the past when he didn't have any actual claim in my decisions, didn't have any real stake in progress of events other than as a friend. You would think that having a claim or stake in things would make the sharing of information openly more important (and it probably does) but it also makes it harder to do. (as is witnessed by how incredibly difficult it was to tell "The One" about my feelings for "The Other")
Also there seems to be a huge shift in my confidence level. I was very secure knowing that "The Other" wanted me when I was merely a fantasy. After all in a fantasy I was everything he wanted. I couldn't possibly disappoint him as a fantasy, and therefore he'd always want me. (that do no wrong thing sounds handy) that and if anything went horribly wrong in our friendship. . . It was just a friendship, albeit a deeper friendship than most I've experienced, but friendships can endure and take breaks and come back as strong friendships. . .Lovers, not so much. It might be purely my fear, but occasionally when I've looked at him lately, I see a twinge of doubt in his eyes. As if for one second he can see me as I truly am and not as that hot fantasy he clings to. I question when he turns down my invitations (which come way too frequently for any man to accept all of) I question when he would rather I sleep with "The One" than him. I question when even as he tells me that I see something in him I haven't seen before, or I have, but it didn't matter because he was only a friend and not a lover. It's that look behind his eyes that he longs to say something he can't say, that he feels something he won't admit, that I dare not ask about now. . . I should, but I don't.
Should I go on? I have one more topic in mind. Overwhelming as it may be to keep going on this pseudo novel. And that would be something that is both the most fantastic news of the day, and also the potential fall of Rome. "The Other" was hired as one of only four people employed by the business that "The One" and I are purchasing stock in. Yup, That means I shall be working with both "The One" and "The Other". "The Other" and I have been co-workers before, in fact that is how we met. However, that was in a place where we weren't in charge of anything, didn't have any expectations, didn't have to run the company (Thank GOD!), didn't have a sexual relationship, and didn't have the third member of this sexual tryst working with us. . . If you see what I mean.
And to make things a little more tricky. . .The working relationship is ill-defined, and I suspect there is more being said between the owner (who hired "The Other") and "The Other" than has been told to "The One" and I. Some of the circumstances of "The One's" being hired have sent large red flags up in my brain and I'm second guessing things about this purchasing concept that I was previously very solid on. As my knowledge of "The Other's" relationship with the owner is very limited, I find I am rather restricted on what business agreement details and potential details I feel comfortable discussing with "The Other" which is kind of a bummer. I'm not used to withholding from "The Other" on anything, not verbally anyway.
I'd write about women, but I'm not so interested. And I've written more than enough to bore the masses already.